Home / About / Editorial Standards & Team
How we work
Trained health writers research the medical literature and write each article in plain language. When an article lists a medical reviewer from our Medical Review Board, that clinician reviewed it before it was published. Articles without a named reviewer are written and checked by the MediSkill Editorial Team. Here is how that works and the rules we follow.
We’re aware that ozone therapy is controversial and that some consider it to have no proof of safety and effectiveness. Yet, several clinical trials have demonstrated its safety and effectiveness.
When we first learned about ozone therapy, we found that it was popular among cutting-edge doctors who can successfully help many tough cases. There were some, but mostly inaccessible and unusable literature in various languages. It’s hard to understand, leaving it up to so-called experts to explain it. While the experts could be excellent physicians, many of them don’t have time or space to create accessible materials. This leaves the communications up to those who don’t fully understand it or conspiracy theories, which can create even more prejudice against ozone therapy.
Our goal is to help lay people and medical professionals access reliable, minimally biased, evidence-based, and useful information about ozone therapy. We don’t provide medical advice or claim that it treats any disease, but instead compile the existing literature in an easy-to-read and accessible way.
According to the Dictionary of Oxford Languages, “evidence-based medicine” refers to the practice or care that emphasizes the practical application of the best available current research. To this end, we cover all forms of evidence, including test tube, animal studies, case reports, and clinical trials.
Science is a dynamic field where discoveries can be confirmed or reproven. Therefore, evidence and conclusions are not absolute and subject to change.
To provide our readers with authoritative content, we rely primarily on scientific evidence, while taking into account potential bias. We strive to cite sources from peer-reviewed medical literature. Occasionally, we may quote our physician colleagues who have real-world experience treating patients with ozone therapy.
For practitioner dosing and contraindications, we lean on the Madrid Declaration on Ozone Therapy, 4th edition (ISCO3, 2025), and on our own practitioner guide for the methods it covers, so readers can check them. When sources disagree, we say so on the page.
As an ozone therapy information site, we’re not 100% unbiased about ozone therapy. However, we’re as transparent as possible.
When researching for your health, we encourage critical thinking and doing your own research. Then, making health decisions for yourself in consultation with your healthcare professional.
For each clinical trial we include, we include details that determine the credibility of the trials, such as:
Where there is no evidence for specific popular treatment, we say so. If we’re extrapolating from another form of treatment, we say so.
Generally, there is very limited, but some, clinical evidence for ozone therapy. Most trials are small and of poor quality.
In an attempt to be as helpful as possible, sometimes we extrapolate from other similar modalities.
We choose to include specific details that are more practically helpful, and generally omit details that readers are likely to already know. Therefore, we refrain from introducing in-depth about health conditions or their prevalence as this is not a site people come to learn about specific health conditions. Instead, we introduce the aspects of the conditions that could be addressed by ozone therapy or practical details that can make ozone therapy harder or easier.
Lack of understanding of how ozone therapy works leads to prejudice against it, taking it away from people who need it the most. In addition, we believe that science should be accessible to everyone. Therefore, we employ editorial techniques to maximize accessibility and helpfulness.
For example:
We carefully select our contributors, choosing those who have medical training and real-life experience on the topic. Our contributors receive training on research and writing about complex topics for the lay audience.
Our Medical Review Board comprises a diverse group of clinicians who are experts in their general specialist fields and use ozone therapy regularly as a tool in their practices. Aside from their knowledge and training, our medical advisors bring their clinical experience, practical angles, and patient advocacy to our content.
Our dedicated health and medical writers thoroughly review the medical literature to understand the totality of the evidence before writing about the topic. Then, they compose the article to maximize accessibility and helpfulness without compromising scientific accuracy. Where an article lists a medical reviewer, that clinician then reviews and revises the draft for medical accuracy and real-life applicability.
MediSkill is paid when practitioners buy our training and when brands sponsor our live events. Read how MediSkill makes money. We do not run ads on our pages. No company pays for what we write, and sponsors have no say over our articles or protocol sheets.
Our clinic directory is separate from our health articles. Read how Find an Ozone Doc works.
Each article shows when it was published and when it was last updated. We update an article when new studies come out, when guidelines change, or when a reader finds a mistake. We change the “Updated” date only when the content changes.
The MediSkill Editorial Team writes and updates our articles. Where an article credits a named author, that person's name appears in the byline at the top of the page. Where a clinician reviewer is named on a page, that person has reviewed it. Some pages, including some News & Research posts, are published by the MediSkill Editorial Team without a named reviewer.
We use AI tools to help draft articles, and our editorial team checks them, including facts and citations, before publishing.
See all of our reviewers on the Medical Review Board page. To learn more about who we are, see About MediSkill.
Science changes, and so do our articles. If you find an error, email contact@mediskill.com with the page link and what you think is wrong. We read every report and check it against the sources. If you are right, we fix it and update the date. For a significant error, we add a note at the top of the article saying what changed.
Mediskill.com is meant to be a source of general information and education only, without offering health or medical advice. Please consult your own medical provider for diagnosis and treatment. Do not disregard medical advice or delay medical attention based on anything you read on the internet.
The publication of content on this website does not constitute a doctor-patient or practitioner-client relationship.